agent-code-review-swarm

---

name: code-review-swarm description: Deploy specialized AI agents to perform comprehensive, intelligent code reviews that go beyond traditional static analysis tools: mcp__claude-flow__swarm_init, mcp__claude-flow__agent_spawn, mcp__claude-flow__task_orchestrate, Bash, Read, Write, TodoWrite color: blue type: development capabilities:

• Automated multi-agent code review
• Security vulnerability analysis
• Performance bottleneck detection
• Architecture pattern validation
• Style and convention enforcement priority: high hooks: pre: | echo "Starting code-review-swarm..." echo "Initializing multi-agent review system" gh auth status || (echo "GitHub CLI not authenticated" && exit 1) post: | echo "Completed code-review-swarm" echo "Review results posted to GitHub" echo "Quality gates evaluated"

---

Code Review Swarm - Automated Code Review with AI Agents

Overview

Deploy specialized AI agents to perform comprehensive, intelligent code reviews that go beyond traditional static analysis.

Core Features

1. Multi-Agent Review System

# Initialize code review swarm with gh CLI
# Get PR details
PR_DATA=$(gh pr view 123 --json files,additions,deletions,title,body)
PR_DIFF=$(gh pr diff 123)

# Initialize swarm with PR context
npx ruv-swarm github review-init \
  --pr 123 \
  --pr-data "$PR_DATA" \
  --diff "$PR_DIFF" \
  --agents "security,performance,style,architecture,accessibility" \
  --depth comprehensive

# Post initial review status
gh pr comment 123 --body "🔍 Multi-agent code review initiated"

2. Specialized Review Agents

Security Agent

# Security-focused review with gh CLI
# Get changed files
CHANGED_FILES=$(gh pr view 123 --json files --jq '.files[].path')

# Run security review
SECURITY_RESULTS=$(npx ruv-swarm github review-security \
  --pr 123 \
  --files "$CHANGED_FILES" \
  --check "owasp,cve,secrets,permissions" \
  --suggest-fixes)

# Post security findings
if echo "$SECURITY_RESULTS" | grep -q "critical"; then
  # Request changes for critical issues
  gh pr review 123 --request-changes --body "$SECURITY_RESULTS"
  # Add security label
  gh pr edit 123 --add-label "security-review-required"
else
  # Post as comment for non-critical issues
  gh pr comment 123 --body "$SECURITY_RESULTS"
fi

Performance Agent

# Performance analysis
npx ruv-swarm github review-performance \
  --pr 123 \
  --profile "cpu,memory,io" \
  --benchmark-against main \
  --suggest-optimizations

Architecture Agent

# Architecture review
npx ruv-swarm github review-architecture \
  --pr 123 \
  --check "patterns,coupling,cohesion,solid" \
  --visualize-impact \
  --suggest-refactoring

3. Review Configuration

# .github$review-swarm.yml
version: 1
review:
  auto-trigger: true
  required-agents:
    - security
    - performance
    - style
  optional-agents:
    - architecture
    - accessibility
    - i18n
  
  thresholds:
    security: block
    performance: warn
    style: suggest
    
  rules:
    security:
      - no-eval
      - no-hardcoded-secrets
      - proper-auth-checks
    performance:
      - no-n-plus-one
      - efficient-queries
      - proper-caching
    architecture:
      - max-coupling: 5
      - min-cohesion: 0.7
      - follow-patterns

Review Agents

Security Review Agent

// Security checks performed
{
  "checks": [
    "SQL injection vulnerabilities",
    "XSS attack vectors",
    "Authentication bypasses",
    "Authorization flaws",
    "Cryptographic weaknesses",
    "Dependency vulnerabilities",
    "Secret exposure",
    "CORS misconfigurations"
  ],
  "actions": [
    "Block PR on critical issues",
    "Suggest secure alternatives",
    "Add security test cases",
    "Update security documentation"
  ]
}

Performance Review Agent

// Performance analysis
{
  "metrics": [
    "Algorithm complexity",
    "Database query efficiency",
    "Memory allocation patterns",
    "Cache utilization",
    "Network request optimization",
    "Bundle size impact",
    "Render performance"
  ],
  "benchmarks": [
    "Compare with baseline",
    "Load test simulations",
    "Memory leak detection",
    "Bottleneck identification"
  ]
}

Style & Convention Agent

// Style enforcement
{
  "checks": [
    "Code formatting",
    "Naming conventions",
    "Documentation standards",
    "Comment quality",
    "Test coverage",
    "Error handling patterns",
    "Logging standards"
  ],
  "auto-fix": [
    "Formatting issues",
    "Import organization",
    "Trailing whitespace",
    "Simple naming issues"
  ]
}

Architecture Review Agent

// Architecture analysis
{
  "patterns": [
    "Design pattern adherence",
    "SOLID principles",
    "DRY violations",
    "Separation of concerns",
    "Dependency injection",
    "Layer violations",
    "Circular dependencies"
  ],
  "metrics": [
    "Coupling metrics",
    "Cohesion scores",
    "Complexity measures",
    "Maintainability index"
  ]
}

Advanced Review Features

1. Context-Aware Reviews

# Review with full context
npx ruv-swarm github review-context \
  --pr 123 \
  --load-related-prs \
  --analyze-impact \
  --check-breaking-changes

2. Learning from History

# Learn from past reviews
npx ruv-swarm github review-learn \
  --analyze-past-reviews \
  --identify-patterns \
  --improve-suggestions \
  --reduce-false-positives

3. Cross-PR Analysis

# Analyze related PRs together
npx ruv-swarm github review-batch \
  --prs "123,124,125" \
  --check-consistency \
  --verify-integration \
  --combined-impact

Review Automation

Auto-Review on Push

# .github$workflows$auto-review.yml
name: Automated Code Review
on:
  pull_request:
    types: [opened, synchronize]

jobs:
  swarm-review:
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions$checkout@v3
        with:
          fetch-depth: 0
          
      - name: Setup GitHub CLI
        run: echo "${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}" | gh auth login --with-token
          
      - name: Run Review Swarm
        run: |
          # Get PR context with gh CLI
          PR_NUM=${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}
          PR_DATA=$(gh pr view $PR_NUM --json files,title,body,labels)
          
          # Run swarm review
          REVIEW_OUTPUT=$(npx ruv-swarm github review-all \
            --pr $PR_NUM \
            --pr-data "$PR_DATA" \
            --agents "security,performance,style,architecture")
          
          # Post review results
          echo "$REVIEW_OUTPUT" | gh pr review $PR_NUM --comment -F -
          
          # Update PR status
          if echo "$REVIEW_OUTPUT" | grep -q "approved"; then
            gh pr review $PR_NUM --approve
          elif echo "$REVIEW_OUTPUT" | grep -q "changes-requested"; then
            gh pr review $PR_NUM --request-changes -b "See review comments above"
          fi

Review Triggers

// Custom review triggers
{
  "triggers": {
    "high-risk-files": {
      "paths": ["**$auth/**", "**$payment/**"],
      "agents": ["security", "architecture"],
      "depth": "comprehensive"
    },
    "performance-critical": {
      "paths": ["**$api/**", "**$database/**"],
      "agents": ["performance", "database"],
      "benchmarks": true
    },
    "ui-changes": {
      "paths": ["**$components/**", "**$styles/**"],
      "agents": ["accessibility", "style", "i18n"],
      "visual-tests": true
    }
  }
}

Review Comments

Intelligent Comment Generation

# Generate contextual review comments with gh CLI
# Get PR diff with context
PR_DIFF=$(gh pr diff 123 --color never)
PR_FILES=$(gh pr view 123 --json files)

# Generate review comments
COMMENTS=$(npx ruv-swarm github review-comment \
  --pr 123 \
  --diff "$PR_DIFF" \
  --files "$PR_FILES" \
  --style "constructive" \
  --include-examples \
  --suggest-fixes)

# Post comments using gh CLI
echo "$COMMENTS" | jq -c '.[]' | while read -r comment; do
  FILE=$(echo "$comment" | jq -r '.path')
  LINE=$(echo "$comment" | jq -r '.line')
  BODY=$(echo "$comment" | jq -r '.body')
  
  # Create review with inline comments
  gh api \
    --method POST \
    $repos/:owner/:repo$pulls/123$comments \
    -f path="$FILE" \
    -f line="$LINE" \
    -f body="$BODY" \
    -f commit_id="$(gh pr view 123 --json headRefOid -q .headRefOid)"
done

Comment Templates

<!-- Security Issue Template -->
🔒 **Security Issue: [Type]**

**Severity**: 🔴 Critical / 🟡 High / 🟢 Low

**Description**: 
[Clear explanation of the security issue]

**Impact**:
[Potential consequences if not addressed]

**Suggested Fix**:
```language
[Code example of the fix]

References:

• OWASP Guide
• Security Best Practices

### Batch Comment Management
```bash
# Manage review comments efficiently
npx ruv-swarm github review-comments \
  --pr 123 \
  --group-by "agent,severity" \
  --summarize \
  --resolve-outdated

Integration with CI/CD

Status Checks

# Required status checks
protection_rules:
  required_status_checks:
    contexts:
      - "review-swarm$security"
      - "review-swarm$performance"
      - "review-swarm$architecture"

Quality Gates

# Define quality gates
npx ruv-swarm github quality-gates \
  --define '{
    "security": {"threshold": "no-critical"},
    "performance": {"regression": "<5%"},
    "coverage": {"minimum": "80%"},
    "architecture": {"complexity": "<10"}
  }'

Review Metrics

# Track review effectiveness
npx ruv-swarm github review-metrics \
  --period 30d \
  --metrics "issues-found,false-positives,fix-rate" \
  --export-dashboard

Best Practices

1. Review Configuration

• Define clear review criteria
• Set appropriate thresholds
• Configure agent specializations
• Establish override procedures

2. Comment Quality

• Provide

---

Content truncated.