tachograph-infringement-triage-root-cause-uk

Tachograph Triage & Root-Cause Prompts (UK)

PURPOSE

Run a weekly review workflow that turns infringement outputs into clear triage notes, root-cause prompts, and “what to check next” steps.

WHEN TO USE

• “Do a weekly tacho and WTD compliance review for these drivers.”
• “Triage these infringements and tell me what to check next.”
• “Summarise this PDF infringement report into actions and driver follow-ups.”

DO NOT USE WHEN…

• You only need a single driver-facing message (use the infringement coach skill).
• You want general rule explanations without records.

INPUTS

• REQUIRED:
  • Driver list + date range
  • Infringement summaries (CSV/PDF extract or pasted lines)
• OPTIONAL:
  • Any known operational context (routes, delays, multi-drop, ferry/train, staffing)
  • Prior RAG history
• EXAMPLES:
  • “Drivers A–F, last week’s infringement PDF attached; need weekly pack.”

OUTPUTS

• weekly-tacho-wtd-review.md (manager-facing)
• triage-actions-by-driver.md
• Success criteria:
  • Clear “next checks” per infringement type
  • Flags where investigation/discipline thresholds may be approaching (per your policy)

WORKFLOW

1. Confirm period and driver list.
   • IF missing → STOP AND ASK THE USER.
2. Normalise infringements into a per-driver list (facts only).
3. Pattern scan using references/common-infringement-patterns.md.
4. For each driver, generate:
   • Likely root-cause prompts (questions to ask, operational checks)
   • “What to check next” steps using assets/what-to-check-next-playbook.md
5. Produce weekly pack using assets/weekly-review-pack-template.md.
6. If RAG escalation depends on missing history → STOP AND ASK THE USER for counts/outcomes.

OUTPUT FORMAT

# triage-actions-by-driver.md
Period:
Sources:

## Driver [X]
Infringements (facts):
- …

What to check next:
- …

Root-cause prompts:
- …

Proposed follow-up:
- Coaching / monitoring / investigation trigger (per policy)

SAFETY & EDGE CASES

• If records appear incomplete (missing days, download gaps), flag as a risk/gap rather than guessing why.
• Avoid blame language; keep triage neutral.

EXAMPLES

• Input: “Weekly review for 12 drivers”
  • Output: weekly pack + per-driver triage actions and check-next prompts